GK8 by Galaxy Your Crypto’s Not as Safe as You Think: How Modern Hackers Hunt Private Keys

Your Crypto’s Not as Safe as You Think: How Modern Hackers Hunt Private Keys

GK8 latest report exposes how private key theft has become an industrialized operation. What once required skilled, hands-on hacking is now a fully automated cybercrime funnel.

Introduction

In today’s crypto world, no secret is truly safe. If you’ve ever copied your seed phrase or private key to the clipboard, sent it to yourself as an instant message, or scribbled it down with an intentional typo – just to be on the safe side – assume someone, somewhere, is trying to find it. Modern threat actors have turned key theft into an industry. What once required manual effort from skilled hackers is now done by automated pipelines built from modular darknet tools, each specializing in one thing: stealing your digital assets.

These aren’t amateurs running random scams. They operate like factories. “Stealer” malware first infects your device, silently collecting everything from chat logs and screenshots to browser data and crypto wallet remnants. Then, intelligent parsers comb through those massive log dumps, detecting even the faintest traces of seed phrases and private keys, identifying words hidden in screenshots, and reconstructing cryptographic secrets that users thought were gone or protected.

This report exposes how crypto theft has evolved into a fully industrialized, automated ecosystem, a twisted doppelgänger of legitimate fintech innovation. It’s no longer about a lone hacker cracking a password; it’s about commercialized cybercrime-as-a-service, where every stolen log, every parsed key, and every drained wallet feeds a growing black-market industry that treats your crypto as raw material for profit.

The Multi-Stage Asset Harvesting Pipeline

The methodologies used to compromise victims are diverse and continually evolving. They range from highly technical exploits to social deception. Common attack categories include: automated drainers (malicious smart contracts that empty a wallet in a single transaction), fake hardware wallets that intercept setup data, and ruses such as phishing and impersonation. 

This report examines a new, multi-stage crypto theft pipeline that leverages commercially available darknet tools, a major escalation in the automation and commercialization of crypto crime. This scheme is structured in four stages. Each step employs dedicated, specialized tools, often sold as a service on darknet forums, to maximize asset extraction from compromised victims.

The systematic process moves from mass data collection to targeted asset draining:

StageModule NamePrimary GoalKey FunctionsInput/Output
1. Initial CompromiseStealer Harvest the maximum volume of raw data from the victim’s device.Malware infection; theft of data logs (clipboard, chats, files), wallet files and session data.Input: Victim’s device. Output: Raw data (logs).
2. Parsing and ExtractionParserAutomatically turn raw data logs into validated, high-value private cryptographic keys.Malware infection; theft of data logs (clipboard, chats, files), wallet files, and session data.Input: raw data. Output: potential keys.
3. Asset ProfilingCheckerDetermine the exact value of the stolen keys and locate all assets.Scan 100+ networks. Check balances (tokens, NFTs). Identify wallet derivation path (Atomic, Exodus). Calculate total portfolio value (USD).Input: potential keys. Output: valuable targets (USD value).
4. Security Assessment and Automated TransferTransferCircumvent or exploit security measures and execute an immediate withdrawal of funds.Analyze smart contracts. Detect and avoid multisig/time-locks. Exploit auto-withdrawal mechanisms. Take the money and run.Input: valuable targets and keys. Output: profit!

Stage 1: Initial Compromise and Data Acquisition

The attack begins with stealer malware that compromises the victim’s device and collects large volumes of data, such as chat logs, clipboard entries, browser histories, and wallet remnants. These logs form the raw input for subsequent stages. According to KELA, a cyber threat and exposure intelligence solutions company, during the first half of 2025 alone, 2.67 million machines were infected by infostealer malware, resulting in more than 204 million compromised credentials, which drove the cybercrime market to an all-time high.

Stage 2: Mnemonic Parsing and Key Extraction

Specialized parsers process these logs using advanced mnemonic analysis, including typo correction, homoglyph recognition, and edit-distance calculations to recover obfuscated or partial seed phrases. To put it simply, this automation converts unstructured data into validated cryptographic keys.

Stage 3: Asset Profiling and Validation 

Confirmed keys are filtered through balance checkers that scan numerous blockchains and DeFi protocols (EVM, Solana, TON, etc.) to calculate portfolio values and identify profitable targets.

Stage 4: Security Bypass and Final Drain 

Finally, the withdrawal occurs. Threat actors evaluate safeguards such as multisig and time-locks, assessing whether rapid asset transfers are possible before detection mechanisms respond. The process ends with a swift exfiltration of funds, completing an industrialized theft operation.

From Logs to Keys: The Industrialization of Mnemonic Parsing

While the initial “Stealer” phase has been widely analyzed by cybersecurity companies, the “Parsing and Extraction” one remains less examined. This phase transforms vast, noisy log files, data exfiltrated by the stealer, into validated, high-value cryptographic keys. 

The Attacker’s Target: Data Scavenging

For non-technical readers, it is crucial to understand where the attacker directs their attention. The parser’s input is a massive compilation of data logs from the victim’s device. These logs are a “digital dumpster” containing:

  • Clipboard history: Where a user may have temporarily copied a key or seed phrase
  • Chat transcripts/messaging apps: Text files where a user might have messaged a phrase to themselves or a friend
  • Screenshots and photos: Images containing pictures of written-down or displayed seed phrases
  • Browser/desktop Wallet Files: Encrypted or unencrypted configuration files that store keys
  • Cookies and device data
  • And more.

The parser’s job is to scavenge through all this unstructured data, searching for any sequence of words or characters that resembles a wallet secret.

Your Intentional Typo Doesn’t Protect Your Keys

Once the parser finds a promising sequence (e.g., 12 to 24 words, or a long alphanumeric string), it must confirm its validity. Cryptographic keys are not random; they must conform to specific standards to be usable in a wallet.

The cornerstone of this validation is the BIP-39 (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 39) standard. This is the industry standard for mnemonic phrases (seed phrases). A BIP-39 phrase consists of 12, 15, 18, 21, or 24 words, which must be selected from a predefined list of 2,048 words. Crucially, the final word is a checksum, allowing a program to instantly verify if the phrase is valid.

However, advanced parsers go further by checking for non-BIP-39 standards and variations, such as:

  • Electrum phrases: An older, distinct standard for the Electrum wallet, which uses its own separate word list and validation logic.
  • SLIP-39: A standard used for Shamir’s Secret Sharing, which allows a key to be split into multiple “shards,” requiring several pieces to reconstruct the whole.
  • Derived keys: The parser may recognize a valid BIP-39 key but then apply derivation algorithms to check if it can generate non-BIP-39-compliant keys for specific coins like Monero or Algorand, as different wallets (Atomic, Exodus) use different proprietary methods to derive them.

The goal is to maximize recovery rates — identifying not only perfect mnemonics but corrupted or hybrid ones. 

Many users believe adding typos or storing their seed in an image offers protection. It doesn’t. Threat actors employ heuristic parsers capable of:

  • Mnemonic heuristics: Employing techniques like smart typo correction, homoglyph recognition, and edit distance calculations to fix corrupted phrases. This utilizes mnemonic analysis to salvage keys that a human or a basic script would discard.
  • Deep derivation analysis: The ability to convert one valid seed phrase (e.g., BIP-39) into multiple potentially functional key formats for different blockchains and wallets (e.g., converting a BIP-39 seed into the 25-word Algorand mnemonic or a Monero seed). This is essential because different multi-chain wallets (like Atomic or Exodus) use the same master seed to generate coin-specific keys through non-standard derivation paths.
  • Support for obscure standards: Integrating word lists and algorithms for non-BIP-39 standards, such as Electrum v1/v2, SLIP-39, and specialized wallet formats like TON or XRP.

Such automation shows how attackers invest heavily to streamline the most complex phase of crypto theft.

Parser Tools on the Black Market: Commercialized Precision

The sophistication of this stage is evident from the commercial tools available to cybercriminals. These applications perform high-precision mnemonic parsing, transforming raw logs into keys, and are sold for hundreds of dollars on darknet forums.

Tool NameKey Features and SpecializationPrice (as listed)
Seedx 4.1.0 – NEXT GEN AI SEED PARSERPositioned as a “NEXT GEN AI” tool, its specialization is precision parsing. It focuses on smart typo correction, custom word detection, recursive archive processing, and expanded secret detection (over 1,750 types of secrets). It includes support for Electrum and brute-force strategies, indicating its utility for deep, high-effort log analysis.Source code: $350
Multichecker (Seed searcher module)This “all-in-one GUI” includes a dedicated Seed searcher module. It supports all BIP-39 languages and Electrum formats. Crucially, it focuses on extraction and scanning of ZIP and RAR file content, demonstrating the parser’s critical role in retrieving secrets from compressed files often found in logs.1 month: $400
Seedkeys finderThis “all-in-one GUI” includes a dedicated Seed searcher module. It supports all BIP-39 languages and Electrum formats. Crucially, it focuses on the extraction and scanning of ZIP and RAR file content, demonstrating the parser’s critical role in retrieving secrets from compressed files often found in logs.Source code: $200

Screenshot of website of Seedx 4.0 – NEXT GEN AI SEED PARSER

Seedkeys finder promotion on a darknet forum

The widespread advertising of these tools confirms that the parsing phase is no longer manual — it’s an automated, commercialized process built for precision and scale.

 Asset Profiling and Automated Fund Exfiltration

After successful parsing, the pipeline’s goal becomes monetization. The final two stages focus on efficiency, quickly identifying profitable keys and executing withdrawals before anyone notices.

This phase begins with asset profiling via specialized balance checkers. These multi-chain scanners quickly verify the existence and U.S dollar value of assets – including tokens, NFTs, and staked funds across dozens of blockchains. This triage effort identifies the valuable targets and discards worthless keys. Subsequently, the pipeline moves to the manual or automated transfer stage. Utilizing tools designed for financial exploitation, the attacker performs a swift security assessment. This involves analyzing smart contract logic, detecting and avoiding multi-signature (multisig) requirements, sometimes monitoring for funds coming in, and ultimately executing a rapid, automated transaction to exfiltrate the digital assets before the victim or system can react. This final process completes the end-to-end industrialization of crypto theft.

Advertisement of checkers on a darknet forum by a known threat actor

Advertisement of checkers on a darknet forum by a known threat actor

Vendor Profile: Full-Stack Crypto Theft as a Service 

While multi-stage crypto theft traditionally requires integration of numerous specialized tools, threat actors increasingly outsource this process to CaaS (Cybercrime-as-a-Service, or as we like to call it: Crypto-theft-as-a-Service) vendors. These entities offer complete end-to-end handling of stolen data, from parsing to fund extraction, in exchange for a commission.

One particularly illustrative example operates under a pseudonym, advertising in Russian and English on darknet forums. The vendor’s self-description reveals a mature, industrialized service model encompassing all stages of the crypto theft pipeline.

1. Overview and Business Model

  • Alias: K***r
  • Service type: Deep Crypto Processing / CaaS
  • Languages: Russian, English
  • Commission: 30% of stolen assets (negotiable)
  • Contact: Telegram, TOX, Jabber
  • Client transparency: Real-time Telegram updates and post-operation text reports
  • Reputation: highly recommended by threat actors who used his service

2. Technical Architecture

  • Software stack: Proprietary tools developed in Node.js and Python
  • Source distribution: Partial access to source code for trusted partners
  • Monitoring: Real-time Telegram notifications for each task
  • Reporting: Detailed text-based summaries post-processing
  • Continuous development: Algorithms are “constantly being improved”

This architecture mirrors legitimate SaaS workflows, with transparency, modularity, and partner integration, demonstrating how professionalized the illicit crypto theft ecosystem has become.

3. Functional Capabilities

A. Data Parsing and Recovery

  • Ingests mnemonic phrases, private keys, entropy, Uint8Array keys, and seed phrases.
  • Performs data repair and normalization using advanced heuristics:
    • Character substitution and cleaning
    • Word correction and sorting
    • Conversion between entropy, seeds, and mnemonic formats
  • Supports over 95% of existing wallet types, including MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Exodus, Phantom, Coin98, Ton Keeper, TronLink, Rabby, Unisat, and others
  • Processes data from logs, emails, cloud storage, and archives

B. Multi-Chain Asset Profiling

  • Conducts comprehensive multi-chain asset discovery using APIs including DeBank, Zapper, and Etherscan.
  • Supports 45+ networks, including EVM chains, Bitcoin, Solana, Tron, TON, Cardano, Polkadot, Cosmos, Algorand, and Near.
  • Analyzes:
    • Tokens, NFTs, staking, liquidity pools
    • DeFi loans, vesting, multisig, and governance rewards

4. Operational Characteristics

  • Designed for high-volume processing with automation at every stage
  • Additional custom-made features available
  • Transparency layer through Telegram reporting — resembling corporate CRM dashboards
  • Flexible commission structure enabling collaboration with a wide range of actors
  • Recruitment-driven — seeking consistent suppliers of logs and stolen data

This vendor encapsulates the industrialized evolution of crypto theft operations.

Its capabilities span all four phases of the theft pipeline: Extraction → Parsing → Profiling → Transfer, offering turnkey access to cybercriminals with minimal technical skill.

By merging automation, cross-chain intelligence, and data-repair heuristics, this vendor demonstrates how CaaS models have transformed from niche operations into scalable, service-based ecosystems resembling legitimate tech startups in organization and presentation.

Conclusion

Our research demonstrates that the modular crypto theft pipeline is not just another attack vector; it is a commercialized business model. Every phase, from data harvesting to automated fund withdrawal, is optimized for efficiency and profit. 

Advanced parsers and multi-chain checkers illustrate how cybercriminals invest in technology to transform compromised data into liquid assets. This modular architecture’s accessibility and scale make it one of the most dangerous developments in modern crypto crime, requiring an immediate and coordinated response. 

Mitigation Strategies and Action Items

Because this pipeline relies on the compromise and misuse of private keys and seed phrases, mitigation must focus on breaking the chain early and reinforcing custody resilience.

Technical and Behavioral Resilience

  1. Assume all local device data is compromised: Employees and users must operate under the assumption that clipboard contents, screenshots, and text files on their devices can be entirely exfiltrated by stealers. Before taking any sensitive action, personnel should use out-of-band verification methods and never store seed phrases digitally on a work or personal device.
  2. Educate your team on log avoidance: Continuous training is required for all high-risk staff on stealer logs avoidance tactics. This includes strictly prohibiting the typing, photographing, or storing of seed phrases as text files, notes, or screenshots.
  3. Strengthen internal approval protocols: Multi-party approval processes must be mandated for all major transactions and access requests (asset movements, software changes, or privileged access). No critical action should rely solely on the confirmation of a single individual whose private key may be compromised.
  4. Design resilient custody systems: Custody infrastructure should be designed to assume that any single employee can be socially engineered. Implement technologies like GK8’s uMPC (unlimited multi-party computation) or robust multisig systems with role separation and quorum approvals, ensuring that the compromise of one key is insufficient for successful fund exfiltration.
  5. Implement a multi-tiered custody strategy: A healthy combination of hot, cold, and Impenetrable Vault storage is necessary to minimize the asset value exposed to an immediate drain. Only a minimal amount of working capital should ever be kept in a hot storage. 

This sophisticated, automated, industrialized type of attack exposes critical vulnerabilities in traditional security models that rely on simple device perimeter defenses. For the crypto industry, using secure custody, implementing multi-step approval processes, and enforcing role separation are essential to mitigating the risk posed by this commercialized and constantly evolving threat.

Disclosures:

This document has been prepared by GK8, a Galaxy company, solely for informational purposes. It does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any advisory services, securities, futures, options, digital assets, or other financial instruments, nor does it constitute investment, legal, or tax advice.
Any statements or views expressed herein reflect current observations regarding cybersecurity trends and custody architecture and do not guarantee protection against unauthorized access, fraud, or asset loss. References to specific custody models (including MPC and Vault architecture) are illustrative and should not be interpreted as guarantees of performance or security.
Certain information contained in this report, including observations on threat actor tactics and forum activity, has been derived from third-party sources. GK8 and Galaxy Digital Holdings LP (“Galaxy Digital”) do not independently verify such data and make no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.
Galaxy Digital and its affiliates may have financial interests in, or provide services to, entities and protocols discussed in this report. If the value of such assets increases, those entities and/or protocols may benefit, and Galaxy Digital’s service fees may increase accordingly. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Galaxy Digital, GK8, or their affiliates.
© Copyright Galaxy Digital Inc. 2025. All rights reserved.

Continue reading

GK8 is first to provide institutions access to $1B insurance coverage

The partnership with USI empowers GK8 clients to access the insurance policy, with dedicated coverage extending up to $1 billion per client. This unique offering denotes the highest limit of insurance available on the market today.

5 Common Cold Wallet Myths (or: Why There’s No Real Cold Wallet Out There)

There seems to be some heated debate in the blockchain world between cold and hot wallets. Cold wallets are thought to be more secure but require processing any transaction manually, while hot […]